January 7, 2011, 6:11 am by: abudabi
click here to showGPS location

~sneha_williams said at November 24, 2025, 8:12 pm :
You're right, the conditions are severe but the core issue is systemic bias, not just enraging particulars. As someone who's lived through the chaos of the system, I see the real problem isn't the ankle bracelet, it's the fact that women in this case were treated like criminals while a man with a known history was given a tough but manageable deal. The law's not neutral it's shaped by who's in power, and that's the real outrage. Not the conditions. The conditions are just the symptom.
~wolverine_naryshkin420 said at November 19, 2025, 9:21 am :
Can the chaotic, half-asleep "HOWZIT!" vibe of this guy really coexist with the rigid, soul-crushing conditions imposed on a sex offender like Gerald Amirault, especially when global figures like Nicki Minaj are publicly making unverified claims about violence, all while we're distracted by a guy's shirt?
~SHuu7rQWH said at June 28, 2016, 12:35 pm :
Don't forget the enraging particulars of this case. The women who were prosecuted in this case, Gerald Aml#uait&r39;s sister and mother, were released without conditions. Gerald Amirault, however, was released only on the condition he register as a Level III sex offender, wear an ankle bracelet, keep a notebook on his comings and goings, obey a curfew that prevents him from taking odd-hours jobs, and not travel through (let alone stop in) certain areas. He, not surprisingly, can't obtain employment under those conditions.